Introduction

If you’ve been injured in an accident in San Antonio, you might be surprised when your insurance claim is reviewed—and possibly denied—by a doctor who has never met you, examined you, or even spoken to you on the phone. These insurance medical reviewers play a crucial role in determining the compensation you receive, yet they often make decisions based solely on paperwork.

At Ryan Orsatti Law, we understand how frustrating and confusing this process can be. This comprehensive guide will help you navigate the complex world of insurance medical reviews, protect your rights, and maximize your chances of receiving fair compensation for your injuries.

What Is an Insurance Medical Review?

Insurance medical reviews are assessments conducted by healthcare professionals hired by insurance companies to evaluate injury claims. Unlike your treating physician who examines you in person, these reviewers typically only review your medical records, diagnostic test results, and treatment plans.

The primary purpose of these reviews is to determine:

While these reviews are presented as objective medical opinions, it’s important to understand that they serve a specific purpose for insurance companies—to minimize payouts and protect profit margins.

Types of Insurance Medical Reviews in Texas

In Texas personal injury cases, you might encounter several types of medical reviews:

Paper Reviews

The most common type involves a doctor reviewing your medical records without any physical examination. These reviewers may spend as little as 15 minutes examining complex medical histories before rendering opinions that can significantly impact your claim.

Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs)

Despite the name suggesting independence, these examinations are typically conducted by doctors chosen and paid by the insurance company. While these at least involve an actual examination, the doctors performing them often have established relationships with insurers and may conduct dozens of these examinations weekly.

Peer Reviews

In these reviews, insurance-hired doctors evaluate the decisions of your treating physicians. They may question the necessity of treatments, diagnostic tests, or medication prescriptions based solely on documentation.

Texas law provides certain protections against unfair medical reviews, though many claimants remain unaware of their rights.

The Texas Insurance Code

The Texas Insurance Code prohibits certain unfair claim settlement practices. Under Section 541.060, insurance companies cannot:

Understanding these protections is essential when challenging biased medical reviews.

Texas Medical Board Regulations

Licensed physicians in Texas must adhere to the Texas Medical Board’s ethical standards, even when performing reviews for insurance companies. These standards require that physicians:

If a medical reviewer violates these standards, you may have grounds to challenge their opinion or even file a complaint with the Texas Medical Board.

Common Tactics Used by Insurance Medical Reviewers

Insurance medical reviewers often employ specific tactics to minimize or deny claims:

Cherry-Picking Medical Information

Reviewers may selectively focus on certain aspects of your medical records while ignoring others. For example, they might highlight a previous injury while disregarding clear evidence that your current symptoms began after your accident.

Mischaracterizing Treatment as “Excessive”

Insurance reviewers frequently label necessary treatments as excessive or experimental, particularly for conditions like soft tissue injuries, which can be difficult to document through imaging studies alone.

Claiming “Pre-existing Conditions”

One of the most common tactics is attributing your current symptoms to pre-existing conditions. This occurs even when you had no prior symptoms or when the accident clearly aggravated a previously asymptomatic condition.

Using Outdated Medical Guidelines

Some reviewers apply outdated or overly restrictive medical guidelines to evaluate your treatment, disregarding more recent medical research or treatment protocols.

How to Protect Yourself Against Unfair Medical Reviews

Taking proactive steps can help strengthen your position against potentially biased insurance medical reviews:

Document Everything

Keep detailed records of:

This documentation creates a comprehensive picture of your injury and recovery that can counterbalance a cursory review of your medical records.

Follow Treatment Plans Consistently

Attend all medical appointments and follow your doctor’s recommendations. Gaps in treatment or failure to follow medical advice can be exploited by insurance medical reviewers to deny or minimize claims.

Request Detailed Medical Records

Ask your treating physicians to document:

Detailed medical documentation is your strongest defense against unfair reviews.

Consider an Independent Medical Examination

If your claim is being challenged based on an insurance medical review, consider obtaining an independent medical examination from a qualified specialist not affiliated with the insurance company. This can provide an objective counterbalance to the insurance company’s review.

When facing an unfair medical review in San Antonio, several legal strategies are available:

Request a Peer-to-Peer Discussion

Your treating physician can request a peer-to-peer discussion with the insurance medical reviewer to address discrepancies in their assessment. These direct communications between medical professionals often resolve misunderstandings or misinterpretations of medical records.

File a Formal Appeal

Most insurance policies have formal appeal procedures for denied claims. These appeals should include:

An experienced San Antonio personal injury attorney can:

At Ryan Orsatti Law, we have extensive experience challenging biased medical reviews and helping clients receive fair compensation for their injuries.

Case Study: Successful Challenges to Insurance Medical Reviews

While respecting client confidentiality, here’s an example of how challenging medical reviews can lead to successful outcomes:

A San Antonio client suffered serious back injuries in a car accident. Despite consistent treatment and clear imaging showing disc herniation, an insurance medical reviewer who never examined the client claimed the injuries were degenerative and unrelated to the accident. Through detailed medical documentation, expert testimony, and aggressive advocacy, we successfully demonstrated the reviewer’s opinion was contradicted by established medical literature and the client’s pre-accident medical history. The case resulted in a settlement that fully compensated the client for necessary medical treatment and lost wages.

The Impact of Recent Texas Legislation

Recent legislative changes in Texas have affected how insurance medical reviews are conducted and challenged:

House Bill 1739

This legislation, passed in 2019, strengthened requirements for transparency in the medical review process. Insurers must now disclose more information about their medical reviewers, including their qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.

Texas Supreme Court Decisions

Recent Texas Supreme Court decisions have addressed the admissibility of certain types of expert testimony in personal injury cases. These rulings impact how medical review opinions can be presented and challenged in court.

Understanding these evolving legal standards is essential when building a strategy to counter biased medical reviews.

Technology and Medical Reviews: A Double-Edged Sword

Technological advances have changed how medical reviews are conducted:

Electronic Medical Records

While electronic medical records improve accessibility, they can also lead to standardized, template-driven documentation that fails to capture the nuances of your condition. Insurance reviewers may cite this standardization to minimize the uniqueness of your injuries.

Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms

Some insurance companies now use AI and algorithms to flag “suspicious” claims or treatments. These systems may identify patterns that trigger additional scrutiny without considering individual circumstances.

Working with an attorney who understands these technological developments can help you navigate these additional layers of review.

Conclusion: Protecting Your Rights After a San Antonio Accident

Dealing with insurance medical reviewers who never examine you can be one of the most frustrating aspects of recovering from an accident. The disconnect between your lived experience of pain and disability and a paper review conducted by a distant medical professional often feels unjust and invalidating.

At Ryan Orsatti Law, we believe that San Antonio accident victims deserve better. Our approach combines thorough medical documentation, strategic legal advocacy, and in-depth knowledge of Texas insurance regulations to challenge biased medical reviews and secure fair compensation for our clients.

If you’re facing challenges with insurance medical reviewers after your San Antonio accident, contact our office for a free consultation. We’re committed to protecting your rights and helping you receive the compensation you need to fully recover from your injuries.

Additional Resources